Canada’s Gay and Lesbian Newspaper, Xtra reports on 9/11/12:
Toronto City Councilâ€™s executive committee has asked the city manager to rewrite the city’s anti-discrimination policy to prohibit criticism of Israel, which would directly affect funding for Pride Toronto.
Council requested the review in June because some councillors say Pride Torontoâ€™s $123,807Â city grantÂ should be contingent on the participation of Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA) in the Pride parade.
The executive committee vote was a stunning 9 to 1.
We’ve been covering the ups and downs of this remarkable story about efforts to ban two simple words: “Israeli apartheid.” This example of trying to legislate a permanent protective shield around only one country in the world is a dramatic example of similar efforts happening across N. America and Europe driven by groups like the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the American Jewish Committee.
The recent passage of HR35 by the California State Assembly, a resolution that grotesquelyÂ conflates criticism of Israel, and pro-human rights activism, with anti-Semitism, exemplifies this disturbing trend.
Most cynical of all- these efforts to run roughshod over free speech rights claim to protect Jews. In fact, they are about protecting the rightwing government of Israel, oftenÂ from Jews (and of course many others). Meanwhile, no other country in the world, not even the United States, enjoys such protections. Or at least straight-faced efforts to legislate such protections.
And why this debate is only happening around the LGBT Pride Parade is another question altogether-which you can find answered at this ground-breaking conference on Homonationalism sponsored by CUNY in NY.
This is just the latest episode of a Simon Weisenthal Center and Canadian B’nai Brith-backed effort going back at least as far as 2010 to ban the group Queers United Against Israeli Apartheid from the Toronto Gay Pride Parade. As we wrote then:
Are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) communities the next battle ground for the struggle over Palestinian equal rights? They certainly are in San Francisco, where this monthâ€™scontroversial Out in Israel festival seeks in part to erase the occupation by promoting Israel as a gay mecca, and in Toronto, where a nasty smear campaign is being waged to ban a group called Queers United Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA) from the annual Pride parade.
Whatâ€™s remarkable about Toronto isnâ€™t that some oppose QuAIAâ€™s presence in the paradeâ€“in the classic tradition of LGBT parades, which are by their very nature acts of political resistance, QuAIAâ€™s message is challenging and itâ€™s meant to be.Â Whatâ€™s amazing is that their opponentsâ€“ who object to the term â€œapartheidâ€ despite its almost commonplace usage by many Israelisâ€“have resorted to openly duplicitous and unethical means for literally banishing the group and harming the parade to achieve their aims.
Actually, it makes perfect sense. You canâ€™t ban a group for using the word â€˜apartheidâ€™, so you have to fabricate evidence to suggest the group is a hate group. And thatâ€™s exactly whatâ€™s happening to QuAIA, which, surprise surprise, includes a lot of self-loving anti-occupation Jews.
Months later, Toronto Prides luminaries were in open and inspiring rebellion against the parade’s capitulation to absurd pressure.
On June 7, over 20 high-level past and present awardees and grand marshals left their statuettes at the door of Pride Toronto following the resignation of the paradeâ€™s international grand marshals. They were protesting what will surely be remembered as one of the most shameful actions ever taken by a pride group: succumbing to pressure from Canadaâ€™s excessively right wing Bâ€™nai Brith to bar the group Queers United Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA) by banning the use of the phrase â€œIsraeli Apartheid.â€
The rebellion worked, and Toronto Pride later reversed positions! (apologies if you are confused–think childhood Yes/No Game. Yes we are censoring you. No, we’re not. Yes, we are. No, we’re not.
Now censors are going around Toronto Pride leadership and straight to the city which could potentially withhold 6 figures if they allow QUAIA to march.
Meanwhile, it’s important to yet again remind elected officials that an increasing number of Israeli political leaders, writers, scholars, South Africans and others use the term Israeli apartheid with nary a wink. Â Ban QUAIA? Then banÂ former Israeli education minister and feminist hero Shulamit Aloni, or formerÂ Israeli Attorney General Michael Ben-Yair, or most recently? Bibi Netanyahu’s nephew: Yoni Ben Artzi, now a grad student at Brown University:Â http://www.alternet.org/world/meet-bibi-netanyahus-refusenik-nephew-who-says-israel-apartheid-state
There are a lot of benefits of a wholesome lifestyle. But can medicines help us? In fact, it is not so easy to find trusted web-site. Choosing the best treatment option for a racy disease can get really confusing considering the merits and demerits of the existing treatment methodologies. Diflucan (fluconazole), the first of a new group of synthetic antifungal agents, is existing as a powder for oral suspension. Viagra which is used to treat erectile dysfunction and similar states when erection is of low quality. Cialis is a medicine prescribed to treat a lot of complaints. What do you know about buy cialis online cheap? Our article focuses on the treatment of erectile dysfunction and buy cialis cheap. Generally, both men and women suffer from sexual dysfunctions. What are the symptoms of sexual disorders? In fact, a scientific reviews found that up to three quarters of men on such drug experience erectile dysfunction. Such disease is best solved with professional help, commonly through counseling with a certified physician. Your sex therapist can help find the treatment that is better for you and your partner. The most common objectionable side effects of such medications like Cialis is dizziness. This is not a complete list of potential side effects and others may occur. Even if this medicament is not for use in women, this medicine is not expected to be harmful to an unborn baby.